The Nexus Archive

Opening the archive

Portrait of Marx

Socialism and Political Economy · History

The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte

by Marx · The Anatomist of Capital · Industrial Modernity, 1818-1883

Marx's political history of the 1848 French Republic, class factions, Bonapartism, and the coup that made Louis-Napoleon emperor.

  • Brutal
  • 1852
  • ~3 hr read
  • 17 chapter guides
  • Public domain

Start reading · Read the Translator's Preface guide free

Before the text

Editor's Prelude

When A Republic Rehearses Its Own Defeat

Paris overthrows a king in February 1848, declares a republic, and promises universal brotherhood. Less than four years later, Louis Bonaparte dissolves the National Assembly and begins turning a famous name into an empire. The Eighteenth Brumaire asks how that reversal became possible. Marx writes political history at the speed of collapse: elections, constitutions, newspapers, soldiers, creditors, street demonstrations, and parliamentary maneuvers all become evidence.

The title reaches back to Napoleon Bonaparte's coup of 18 Brumaire in 1799, but Marx's sharpest point is that the nephew cannot simply repeat the uncle. France keeps borrowing costumes from its revolutionary past while the social forces underneath them have changed. That is why tragedy returns as farce, and why the comedy is not harmless. Parties defeat their rivals, discard their own sources of power, and call each retreat a defense of order until parliament has made itself easy to remove.

Behind the rapid changes of names and factions lie struggles over land, wages, credit, and state power. Marx follows their consequences with the anger of revolutionary defeat and the eye of a satirist. The constitutional speeches are solemn; the bargains, fears, and betrayals behind them are often grotesque.

The opening pages

Section I: History in Borrowed Dress

SECTION I

Hegel says somewhere that all great historic facts and personages recur twice. He forgot to add: “Once as tragedy, and again as farce.” Caussidiere for Danton, Louis Blanc for Robespierre, the “Mountain” of 1848-51 for the “Mountain” of 1793-95, the Nephew for the Uncle. The identical caricature marks also the conditions under which the second edition of the eighteenth Brumaire is issued.

Man makes his own history, but he does not make it out of the whole cloth; he does not make it out of conditions chosen by himself, but out of such as he finds close at hand. The tradition of all past generations weighs like an alp upon the brain of the living. At the very time when men appear engaged in revolutionizing things and themselves, in bringing about what never was before, at such very epochs of revolutionary crises do they anxiously conjure up into their service the spirits of the past, assume their names, their battle cries, their costumes to enact a new historic scene in such time-honored disguise and with such borrowed language. Thus did Luther masquerade as the Apostle Paul; thus did the revolution of 1789-1814 drape itself alternately as Roman Republic and as Roman Empire; nor did the revolution of 1848 know what better to do than to parody at one time the year 1789, at another the revolutionary traditions of 1793-95. Thus does the beginner, who has acquired a new language, keep on translating it back into his own mother tongue; only then has he grasped the spirit of the new language and is able freely to express himself therewith when he moves in it without recollections of the old, and has forgotten in its use his own hereditary tongue.

When these historic conjurations of the dead past are closely observed a striking difference is forthwith noticeable. Camille Desmoulins, Danton, Robespierre, St. Juste, Napoleon, the heroes as well as the parties and the masses of the old French revolution, achieved in Roman costumes and with Roman phrases the task of their time: the emancipation and the establishment of modern bourgeois society. One set knocked to pieces the old feudal groundwork and mowed down the feudal heads that had grown upon it; Napoleon brought about, within France, the conditions under which alone free competition could develop, the partitioned lands be exploited, the nation’s unshackled powers of industrial production be utilized; while, beyond the French frontier, he swept away everywhere the establishments of feudality, so far as requisite, to furnish the bourgeois social system of France with fit surroundings of the European continent, and such as were in keeping with the times. Once the new social establishment was set on foot, the antediluvian giants vanished, and, along with them, the resuscitated Roman world—the Brutuses, Gracchi, Publicolas, the Tribunes, the Senators, and Caesar himself. In its sober reality, bourgeois society had produced its own true interpreters in the Says, Cousins, Royer-Collards, Benjamin Constants and Guizots; its real generals sat behind the office desks; and the mutton-head of Louis XVIII was its political head. Wholly absorbed in the production of wealth and in the peaceful fight of competition, this society could no longer understand that the ghosts of the days of Rome had watched over its cradle. And yet, lacking in heroism as bourgeois society is, it nevertheless had stood in need of heroism, of self-sacrifice, of terror, of civil war, and of bloody battle fields to bring it into the world. …

Continue reading →

Read it in a Quest

Wealth & Society →

A study of wealth as moral pressure, social order, labor, class, and exchange.

Chapter guides · 17

  1. Translator's Preface

    Why This History Matters

    De Leon frames Marx's book as political education, not distant French trivia.

    Political education for Americans

    De Leon presents French history as a guide to American workers’ struggles. He argues that France and the United States share important political and economic conditions. Foreign names can make those similarities harder to recognize. For him, Marx’s value lies in explaining how class interests shape events, so workers can act with greater understanding.

    The background to February

    De Leon then explains the title’s reference to Napoleon’s earlier seizure of power. His historical sketch moves from the restored Bourbon monarchy to Louis Philippe’s rule, backed by wealthy financiers. Industrial capitalists help overthrow that monarchy in February 1848. He closes by arguing that the same social conflicts have American counterparts. These comparisons are De Leon’s, signed in 1897.

  2. Section I: History in Borrowed Dress

    History Starts in Costume

    Marx begins with borrowed names, old symbols, and a revolution trapped by memory.

    Revolutions borrow the past

    Marx says people make history under conditions they inherit. In crises, they borrow famous names, slogans and costumes. Earlier revolutions used Roman or biblical images to inspire genuinely new struggles. In 1848, he argues, France imitates the old revolution without recreating its achievements. Louis Bonaparte’s resemblance to Napoleon is part of that damaging farce.

    A defeat that needs explaining

    Marx contrasts fast bourgeois victories with workers’ revolutions that repeatedly question their own efforts and retreat. Democrats expect a future electoral triumph, then the December coup sweeps away their institutions. Calling it a surprise explains too little. The closing question is how millions of people could submit to a few adventurers without resisting.

  3. Section I: The Republic and the June Defeat

    The June Defeat Narrows the Republic

    The June Days push the working class offstage and leave the republic in bourgeois hands.

  4. Section II: The Constitution's Two Heads

    A Constitution With Two Sovereigns

    The Assembly and the president each receive a claim to represent the nation.

  5. Section II: The Republic Undermines Itself

    The Republic Trains Its Destroyer

    Repression and parliamentary maneuver strip the Constitution of the forces that could defend it.

  6. Section III: The Party of Order

    Order Is A Class Coalition

    Marx identifies the social interests hidden inside royalist names and republican forms.

  7. Section III: The Mountain and the National Guard

    The Mountain Mistakes A Gesture For Power

    A democratic alliance reaches for constitutional resistance without organizing the force to sustain it.

  8. Section IV: Bonaparte Steps Forward

    Bonaparte Takes Control of the Ministry

    The coalition loses its ministry while its fear of public debate undermines self-government.

  9. Section IV: Order Against Self-Government

    Order Wounds Its Own Republic

    Restricting the electorate helps the Assembly try to control both parliamentary and presidential elections.

  10. Section V: The Society of December 10

    Bonaparte Builds a Street Machine

    Money, spectacle, police protection, and the Society of December 10 become political tools.

  11. Section V: Parliamentary Chicanery

    Procedure Becomes A Weapon

    Evasions over parliamentary protection and a fraudulent lottery clear the way for an attack on the army’s command.

  12. Section V: Changarnier and the Lost Army

    Parliament Loses Its Arms

    Once Changarnier falls, the Assembly has constitutional language but no force behind it.

  13. Section VI: Revision and the Party's Fracture

    The Majority Splits Itself

    The question of constitutional revision exposes rival ambitions inside the party of Order.

  14. Section VI: The Bourgeoisie Abandons Parliament

    The Bourgeoisie Abandons Its Parliament

    Commercial society treats its own political rule as an obstacle to order and credit.

  15. Section VI: The Coup and Parliament's End

    The Coup Arrives After Repeated Surrenders

    The final chronology shows parliament authoring its own impotence before December 2.

  16. Section VII: The Peasant Base of Bonapartism

    A Name Represents An Isolated Class

    Marx turns from the coup's mechanics to the peasant structure that makes Bonapartism possible.

  17. Section VII: Debt, Patronage, and the State

    Debt And Patronage Complete The Regime

    The Napoleonic promise of protection becomes taxes, bureaucracy, finance, and purchased loyalty.

Continue with Premium

Questions readers ask

How long does it take to read The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte?
About 3 hr in total.
How difficult is The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte?
Brutal. A mid-length history; about 3 hours of reading.
Which translation is this?
The Daniel De Leon translation from the German, first published in 1852. The text follows The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1898).
Can I read The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte for free?
The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte is part of Nexus Premium, so reading it needs an account and a Premium subscription. The opening above and two chapter guides on this page are free to read.
How many chapter guides are there?
17 chapter guides, written by the Nexus editors. Two open in full here; the rest show their opening line.

About Marx

Karl Marx was a German philosopher, economist, journalist, and revolutionary theorist. His work analyzes capitalism, class conflict, alienated labor, ideology, and historical change, most famously in The Communist Manifesto and Capital.

“Who benefits from the way society is built?”

Marx gives Nexus one of modernity's most consequential critiques of economics, power, and social order.

Source text: public domain. Chapter guides: original Nexus writing. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte is part of The Nexus Archive, guided Quests through the great works.

Sources & Licenses